Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) in International Law, Harvard University
The most fateful questions may not be asked or debated at the Republican televised debate on Wednesday, August 23. The debate will be broadcast on Fox News from 9-11 pm ET.
Those questions relate to the policy of the different candidates toward continuing to provide military and economic support to Ukraine, to meet the requirements of Ukraine, and continued leadership of tbe Western alliance supporting Ukraine with weapons and money.
In the United States, we are living in a news silo in which the cable news media are obsessed with the details of the criminal legal proceedings against Donald Trump, as if they were presenting an ongoing series of CSI-style crime dramas.
Today there is little coverage of world affairs. Coverage of the Ukraine war seems limited to the latest “breaking news”. As a result viewers may have little interest in the Ukraine war, and consequently the cable news channels, driven by the quest for ratings and profit, may pay little attention to the gravest challenge facing America today:
How will the U.S. respond going forward to the challenges represented by continuing Russian aggression against Ukraine, and the continuing commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide against its population?
Donald Trump and most but not all of the candidates for the Republican nomination have taken positions indicating they would not continue such support.1
In view of the above, the key issues that should be debated on Wednesday include the following:
1) Will a candidate condemn tbe Russian invasion of Ukraine and vow to continue military and economic assistance to Ukraine at levels that are needed, and will he or she pledge to uphold the sanctions in place against Russia?
2) What does the candidate believe should be done, if anything, to uphold international law and the United Nations Charter, and the current U.N.Charter-based international order?
3) What relationship does the candidate see between the war in Ukraine and the ability of the world’s nations acting through the United Nations to meet the challenges of global warming and climate change?
Candidates should be required to state what specific actions they would take to implement the policies they say they would support.
As when Britain and the West faced Nazi Germany in 1940 and throughout World War II, the United States and the West today face historical challenges which will decide whether tens or hundreds of millions of people live in freedom or under totalitarian dictatorships.
On which side will America stand if a particular candidate becomes President of the United States?
That is a question worthy of debate, especially at the Republican debate among primary candidates on Wednesday night.
***
See also,
1)“REPRISE (from January 26, 2022): Reflections on Czechoslovakia (1968) and Ukraine (2022)-- August 20, 1968: ‘Dubček, Svoboda!’”, The Trenchant Observer, August 21, 2023.
2)“Ukraine War, August 17, 2023: Le Monde editorial highlights strategic failures of the West,” The Trenchant Observer, August 17, 2023.
***
Support the Author
Your author needs your support.
You may order a Paid subscription or upgrade to a Founding Member subscription by clicking on the “Subscribe” button below. (Substack takes 10% of the subscription amount.)
Alternatively, you may make a contribution to the author’s Go Fund Me appeal by clicking on the last button below. Go Fund Me does not take 10%.
See., e.g., Ishaan Tharoor, “Ukraine’s hopes for maximal victory look remote,” The Washington Post, August 21, 2023 (12:00 a.m. EDT).
8/23
I like this article but timing means you may be writing a revised article after the debates pointing out the same issues.
If you do then I say publish it