REPRISE: Appointments: The United States becomes a Banana Republic under Trump (2017)--with current commentary
The Past as Prologue
Trump’s Appointments: The United States becomes a Banana Republic under Trump
First published in The Trenchant Observer, on January 10, 2017. Reprinted from The Rape of American Democracy: Republican Actions and Democratic Failures, 2016-2021 (2024), pp. 41-44.
Donald Trump has learned from Valdimir Putin that to carry the day you need only to overwhelm your adversaries with lies, distortions, and diversions that drive them to distraction, leaving them no opportunity for coherent, much less effective, opposition.
So, we have had five Senate confirmation hearings for cabinet officials on one day. The hearings were scheduled before some of the nominees had been cleared by the ethics office, and in some cases before they had even submitted their paperwork. Trump has set the tone. He has never submitted his tax returns or other information sufficient to identify his conflicts of interest, which appear to be enormous.
Just like in a Banana Republic, he hired his 36 year-old son-in law, Jared Kushner, to be a top adviser, to help do his thinking in the White House, just like he did his thinking during the campaign.
With a few important exceptions (Defense Secretary Mattis, Secretary of State Tillerson) Trump made little pretense of finding the best qualified people in the country to fill cabinet positions. With some exceptions, he named people who were fellow billionaires, or prominent retired military officials.
Generally he seemed to like individuals who were either billionaires or multi-millionaires, or who looked the part, as if they were contestants on one of his television shows. In one case, this led to an Indian-American governor, Nikki Haley, capable but with no foreign policy experience, being nominated to be ambassador to the United Nations.
The United Nations, as a former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), himself an African-American and a wry observer of American attitudes decades ago, once told the author, is where all the "funny-looking people" are. This attitude reflects the way many people thought 40 years ago.
In any event, Trump hasn't nominated any "funny-looking people" to other cabinet posts, except for Ben Carson, or many women, or indeed many individuals under the age of 60 or 65. There are generations of Americans who are not represented in his cabinet picks.
As for Carson, the full story may not be known as to why he remained in the primary race long after he had lost any serious support, further dividing the votes among Trump's rivals. He has no obvious qualifications to be Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, aside from his personal experience growing up poor and then becoming successful.
As in a Banana Republic, policy is made or not made in a dramatically haphazard way. Leading opponents of different departments and their programs have been named to head these same departments. One thing most though not all nominees have in common is that they hold extreme right-wing views, far from the mainstream of American politics.
The United States is in for a difficult slog, with a president of authoritarian tendencies and impetuous temperament, who will have in his undisciplined hands the power to destroy, and who has given every indication of his intent to use it.
He will have the power to destroy alliances and cooperative relationships with other countries or groups of countries, such as NATO and the European Union, or the current cooperative relationship with China leading the effort to slow global climate change.
He will have the power to enter war, to engage in abject appeasement of Vladimir Putin, and to make mistakes which could lead to nuclear war.
Psychologically, he shows little evidence of being a well-balanced person. This emotionally unstable person, our president, will have the power to destroy the world.
Before becoming president, Trump repeatedly violated the Logan Act, which makes it a felony for a private individual to interfere with the conduct of the foreign policy of the United States. Already by telegraphing his intent to do nothing to support the moderate Syrian rebels, he has emboldened Vladimir Putin to commit massive war crimes in one final push to eradicate the rebels in Aleppo.
Trump has uttered not a word of criticism of Putin or of Russia, not even of the Russian intervention in the 2016 presidential elections aimed at throwing the election to him.
Citizens are dumbfounded as the president-elect continues the same pattern of behavior which characterized his campaign and his earlier life. Supporters hold their breaths, in blind faith and clinging to blind ideology. Opponents are paralyzed by their own disbelief at what is happening and by the mantra of their democratic values, despite the accumulating evidence that disaster awaits us.
Trump may be smart, or clever, in an unprincipled way. But he has an authoritarian personality, is a compulsive liar, shows no respect for any individual, and to date has shown himself to be a man of low moral character.
The only question is how long it will take citizens who supported him to come to their senses, if they do, and to realize the catastrophe they have brought upon the country, and the world.
How long it may take for democrats and others to organize disciplined and determined resistance to Trump's assault on longstanding traditions, values, and even laws, sufficient as to halt or greatly slow the damage he will do, is a question upon whose answer the fate of the republic may depend.
Until such resistance by leading figures emerges, we can look forward to America becoming one of the biggest Banana Republics in history. Instead of directing rational and analytical arguments at Trump, citizens would do well to view again Woody Allen's classic 1971 film, "Bananas".
Update: Implications for Trump II cabinet and high-level nominations and confirmations
With Donald Trump, the Past does indeed seem to be prologue. His first term does seem to reveal the same playbook he is following now.
He has nominated to cabinet and other high-level positions individuals who are spectacularly unqualified for the positions for which they have been nominated. In a number of cases they have been vehemently opposed to the very institutions they are now nominated to lead.
The nomination of Pete Hegseth, a Fox News commentator, to be Defense Secretary shows the cavalier approach adopted by Trump in choosing his nominees. Others, such as Tulsi Gabbard, appear to represent a national security threat.In addition to being totally unqualified to be Director of National Intelligence, Gabbard’s actions and statements suggest strong pro-Russian sympathies.
As in his first term, Trump is trying to rush his nominees through in order to ensure tgat they do not receive close scrutiny. What other purpose could be pursued by having five confirmation hearings on a single day, as occurred in 2017?
Trump’s reported attempt to bypass the normal confirmation process by adjourning congress makes sense only if the goal is to avoid close scrutiny of nominees not likely to withstand such scrutiny.
In many cases Trump’s nominations are like a poke in the eye to those concerned with the performance of nominees once confirmed and in office.Certainly the nomination of Matt Gaetz had that feel about it.
One should not discount the possibility that Trump’s advisors are intentionally using such outrageous nominations to distract attention while other top nominees, also objectionable but not so well-known, succeed in slipping by as the most outrageous nominees draw the spotlight. One should pay particular attention to nominees with evidence of pro-Russian leanings.
We should never forget, moreover, that Trump himself may be a Russia asset.
***
James Rowles is a former Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School and professor of international law at other universities.
He studied the history of Nazi Germany at Stanford, and has studied and worked on human rights, judicial reform, and access to justice projects in many countries in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and in Afghanistan and Russia. At Harvard Law School, he taught a course on “Law, Human Rights, and the Struggle for Democracy in Latin America”.
At the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) of the OAS, he worked on human rights cases involving forced disappearances, executions, and torture in a number of authoritarian countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Recent Books by the Author
The Rape of American Democracy: Republican Actions and Democratic Failures, 2016-2021 (September, 18, 2024). Available on Amazon and from IngramSpark by clicking on a link here.
Don’t Be Stupid. Pay Attention, Damn It! Advice for Undecided Voters and Voters Leaning Toward Trump (November 11, 2024). Available on Amazon and from IngramSpark by clicking on a link here.
***
Support the Author
We encourage you to join the community that supports the Trenchant Observations newsletter.
You may sign up for a free subscription. But to receive all of the content as soon as it is published and to support the newsletter, please upgrade to a Paid or Founding Member subscription. To do so, click on the “Subscribe now” button below.
Alternatively, you may make a contribution to the author’s Go Fund Me appeal by clicking on the last button below. Or contact the author at jrowles93@gmail.com for details on making a direct Zelle transfer.
Finally, in addition to subscriptions and contributions, you can buy the books listed above, read them (one chapter at a time), and send me your comments and reactions.